Література - рекомендації щодо ведення пацієнтів з інфарктом міокарда з підйомом сегмента st

ЛІТЕРАТУРА

1. ACCF / AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Methodologies and Policies from the ACCF / AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Available at: http: //acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/manual/ pdfs / methodology.pdf. Accessed August 1 2009.
2. Smith SC Jr., Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr., et al. ACC / AHA / SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC / AHA / SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006-47: e1-121.
3. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC / AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) . J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004-44: e1-e211.
4. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 210-47.
5. King SB III, Smith SC Jr., Hirshfeld JW Jr., et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC / AHA / SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC / AHA / SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 172-209.
6. Gurm H, Tamhane U, Meier P, et al. A comparison of abciximab and small molecule glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent. 2009-2: 230-6.
7. De Luca G, Ucci G, Cassetti E, et al. Benefits from small molecule administration as compared with abciximab among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009-53: 1668-73.
8. Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, et al. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008-358: 2205-17.
9. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008-358: 2218-30.
10. Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Schulz S, et al. Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial. Circulation. 2009-119: 1933-40.
11. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Percoco G, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial. JAMA. 2008-299: 1788-99.
12. Van&rsquo-t Hof AW, Ten Berg J, Heestermans T, et al. Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008-372: 537-46.
13. Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST- elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009-373: 723-31.
14. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, et al. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 2705- 18.
15. Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, et al. Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in- AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2008-371: 559-68.
16. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 1283-97.
17. Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst I, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2008-358: 557-67.
18. Sardella G, Mancone M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size: the EXPIRA (thrombectomy with export catheter in infarct-related artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention) prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009-53: 309-15.
19. Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac Angiography in Renally Impaired Patients (CARE) study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2007-115: 3189-96.
20. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 213-24.
21. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 961-72.
22. Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C, et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptifibatide in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 2176-90.
23. Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 2165-75.
24. Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al. AHA / ACCF / HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia / infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology- the American College of Cardiology Foundation- and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009-53: 1003-11.
25. Hamm C. ON-TIME-2. Ongoing-Tirofiban In Myocardial Infarction evaluation 1 year follow-up. Available at: clinicaltrialresults.org/ slides / OnTime2-Orlando.ppt. Accessed March 30 2009.
26. Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Gibson CM, et al. Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38). Am Heart J. 2006-152: 627-35.
27. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007-357: 2001-15.
28. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr., et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007-138: 652-5.
29. Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D, et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2005-111: 2560-4.
30. Plavix (clopidogrel bisulfate) [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: Bristol- Myers Squibb Sanofi-aventis. Sanofi-aventis 2009.
31. Kim JH, Newby LK, Clare RM, et al. Clopidogrel use and bleeding after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Am Heart J. 2008-156: 886-92.
32. Ho PM, Maddox TM, Wang L, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA. 2009-301: 937-44.
33. Juurlink DN, Gomes T, Ko DT, et al. A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. CMAJ. 2009-180: 713-8.
34. Stanek E. Medco study: PPIs reduce clopidogrel efficacy post-stenting. Available at: https://cardiobrief.org/2009/05/06/scai-clopidogrelppi-wed-1130am/. Accessed July 29 2009.
35. O&rsquo-Donoghue ML, Braunwald E, Antman EM, et al. Pharmacodynamic effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel and prasugrel with or without a proton- pump inhibitor: an analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet. 2009-374: 989-97.
36. Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Arques S, et al. Adjusted clopidogrel loading doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index decrease rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with clopidogrel resistance: a multicenter randomized prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 1404-11.
37. Prasugrel [drug label]. Indianapolis, Ind: Eli Lilly and Co. 2009.
38. Wrishko RE, Ernest CS, Small DS, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analyses to evaluate the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on exposure of prasugrel active metabolite in TRITON-TIMI 38. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009-49: 984-98.
39. Michelson AD. Platelet function testing in cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2004-110: e489-93.
40. Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004-364: 331-7.
41. Jneid H, Bhatt DL, Corti R, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: therapeutic insights from the CURE study. Arch Intern Med. 2003-163: 1145-53.
42. Mehta SR, Yusuf S. The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial programme- rationale, design and baseline characteristics including a meta-analysis of the effects of thienopyridines in vascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2000-21: 2033-41.
43. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet. 2001-358: 527-33.
44. Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association / American Stroke Association Council on Stroke. Stroke. 2006-37: 577-617.
45. Bhatt DL, Flather MD, Hacke W, et al. Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007-49: 1982- 8.
46. Lau WC, Gurbel PA. The drug-drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. CMAJ. 2009-180: 699-700.
47. Collet JP, Hulot JS, Pena A, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study. Lancet. 2009-373: 309-17.
48. Roden DM, Stein CM. Clopidogrel and the concept of high-risk pharmacokinetics. Circulation. 2009-119: 2127-30.
49. Sibbing D, Stegherr J, Latz W, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss- offunction polymorphism and stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2009-30: 916-22.
50. Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 363-75.
51. Mega J, Thakuria JV, Cannon CP, Sabatine MS. Sequence variations in CYP metabolism genes and cardiovascular outcomes following treatment with clopidogrel: insights from the CLARITY-TIMI 28genomic study. Available at: https://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/reprint/51/ 10_Suppl_A / A178.pdf. Accessed May
52. 2009.
53. Giusti B, Gori AM, Marcucci R, et al. Relation of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism to occurrence of drug-eluting coronary stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009-103: 806-11.
54. Mega J, Close S, Wiviott S, et al. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2009-360: 354-62.
55. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Available at: https://pharmacistsletter.com/(S(ea4ssifcnuy01j45v2l24zqc))/pl/detaildocume nts / 250601.pdf? Cs_&s_PL. Accessed May 26 2009.
56. Michelson AD, Frelinger AL III, Braunwald E, et al. Pharmacodynamic assessment of platelet inhibition by prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. Eur Heart J. 2009-30: 1753-63.
57. Small DS, Farid NA, Payne CD, et al. Effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008-48: 475-84.
58. Price MJ, Berger PB, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Evaluation of individualized clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with high residual platelet reactivity: design and rationale of the GRAVITAS trial. Am Heart J. 2009-157: 818-24.
59. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2005-352: 1179-89.
60. Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS, et al. ACCF / ACG / AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-52: 1502-17.
61. Aubert RE, Epstein RS, Teagarden JR, et al. Proton pump inhibitors effect on clopidogrel effectiveness: the Clopidogrel Medco Outcomes Study. Circulation. 2008-118: S-815. Abstract.
62. Dunn SP, Macaulay TE, Brennan DM, et al. Baseline proton pump inhibitor use is associated with increased cardiovascular events with and without the use of clopidogrel in the CREDO trial. Circulation. 2008-118: S815. Abstract.
63. Ramirez JF, Selzer F, Chakaprani R. Proton pump inhibitor and clopidogrel combination is not associated with adverse clinical outcomes after PCI: the NHLBI Dynamic Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009-53: A27-8. Abstract.
64. Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC, et al. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, doubleblind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 256-60.
65. Sibbing D, Morath T, Stegherr J, et al. Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost. 2009-101: 714-9.
66. Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL, et al. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation. 2007-116: 2923-32.
67. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information for Healthcare Professionals: Update to the labeling of Clopidogrel Bisulfate (marketed as Plavix) to alert healthcare professionals about a drug interaction with omeprazole (marketed as Prilosec and Prilosec OTC). Available at: https://fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformation for Patient and Providers / Drug Safety Information for Healthcare Professionals / ucm190787.htm. Accessed November 17 2009.
68. Taha AS, McCloskey C, Prasad R, et al. Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009-374: 119-25.
69. Mehran R, Brodie B, Cox DA, et al. The Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) Trial: study design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2008-156: 44-56.
70. Dangas GD, Lansky AJ, Brodie BR. Predictors of Stent Thrombosis After Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The HORIZONS-AMI Trial. Available at: https://cardiosource.com/ rapid news summaries / summary.asp? SumID = 406. Accessed August 3 2009.
71. ASSENT-4 PCI Investigators. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet. 2006-367: 569-78.
72. Ellis SG, Armstrong P, Betriu A, et al. Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial. Am Heart J. 2004-147: E16.
73. Deleted in proof.
74. Alp NJ, Gershlick AH, Carver A, et al. Rescue angioplasty for failed thrombolysis in older patients: insights from the REACT trial. Int J Cardiol. 2008-125: 254-7.
75. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2005-353: 2758-68.
76. Collet JP, Montalescot G, Le May M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis: a multiple meta-analyses approach according to the type of strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006-48: 1326-35.
77. Wijeysundera HC, Vijayaraghavan R, Nallamothu BK, et al. Rescue angioplasty or repeat fibrinolysis after failed fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007-49: 422-30.
78. Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Van de Werf F, et al. Mortality at 1 year with combination platelet glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibition and reduced-dose fibrinolytic therapy vs conventional fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: GUSTO V randomized trial. JAMA. 2002-288: 2130-5.
79. Pinto DS, Kirtane AJ, Nallamothu BK, et al. Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy. Circulation. 2006-114: 2019-25.
80. Antman EM. Time is muscle: translation into practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-52: 1216-21.
81. Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Chen J, et al. Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. BMJ. 2009-338: b1807.
82. Armstrong PW, Westerhout CM, Welsh RC. Duration of symptoms is the key modulator of the choice of reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009-119: 1293-303.
83. Jacobs AK, Antman EM, Faxon DP, et al. Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation. 2007-116: 217-30.
84. Jacobs AK. Regional systems of care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: being at the right place at the right time. Circulation. 2007-116: 689-92.
85. Bonow RO, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS, et al. ACC / AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-52: 2113-7.
86. Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, et al. ACC / AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-STelevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2008-118: 2596-648.
87. American Heart Association. Get With The Guidelines. Available at: https://americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml7identifier_1165. Accessed June 10 2009.
88. Measure Comparison (Inpatient Hospital Quality Measures). Available at: https://qualitynet.org/dcs/ContentServer7c = Page&pagename = QnetPublic% 2FPage% 2FQnetTier3&cid_1138900297065. Accessed June 10 2009.
89. National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Action Registry = GWTG. Available at: https://ncdr.com/webncdr/ACTION/Default.aspx. Accessed June 10 2009.
90. The Joint Commission. Acute Myocardial Infarction Core Measure Set. Available at: https://jointcommission.org/PerformanceMeasurement/ PerformanceMeasurement / Acute + Myocardial + Infarction + Core + Measure + Set.htm. Accessed June 10 2009.
91. American Heart Association. Mission: lifeline. Available at: https://americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier = 3050213. Accessed June
92. 2009.
93. Henry TD, Sharkey SW, Burke MN, et al. A regional system to provide timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007-116: 721-8.
94. Le May MR, So DY, Dionne R, et al. A citywide protocol for primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008-358: 231-40
95. Ting HH, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, et al. Regional systems of care to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Mayo Clinic STEMI Protocol. Circulation. 2007-116: 729-36.
96. Kosiborod M, Inzucchi SE, Goyal A, et al. Relationship between spontaneous and iatrogenic hypoglycemia and mortality in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2009-301: 1556-64.
97. Malmberg K, Norhammar A, Wedel H, et al. Glycometabolic state at admission: important risk marker of mortality in conventionally treated patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction: long-term results from the Diabetes and Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study. Circulation. 1999-99: 2626-32.
98. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006-354: 449-61.
99. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC / AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina / non-STelevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina / Non ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007-50: e1-157.
100. Wiener RS, Wiener DC, Larson RJ. Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008-300: 933-44.
101. Moghissi ES, Korytkowski MT, DiNardo M, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2009-32: 1119-31.
102. Deedwania P, Kosiborod M, Barrett E, et al. Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Anesthesiology. 2008-109: 14-24.
103. Marfella R, Di Filippo C, Portoghese M, et al. Tight glycemic control reduces heart inflammation and remodeling during acute myocardial infarction in hyperglycemic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009-53: 1425-36.
104. Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst I, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008-371: 1915-20.
105. Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Bhatt DL. Role of adjunctive thrombectomy and embolic protection devices in acute myocardial infarction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2008-29: 2989-3001.
106. Burzotta F, De Vita M, Gu YL, et al. Clinical impact of thrombectomy in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient-data pooled analysis of 11 trials. Eur Heart J. 2009-30: 2193-203.
107. Stone GW, Lansky AJ, Pocock SJ, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009- 360: 194 659
108. Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment (&lsquo-cooling-off strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003-290: 1593-9.
109. Marroquin OC, Selzer F, Mulukutla SR, et al. A comparison of bare- metal and drug-eluting stents for off-label indications. N Engl J Med. 2008-358: 342-52.
110. Garg P, Normand SL, Silbaugh TS, et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry. Circulation. 2008-118: 2277-85.
111. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004-350: 221-31.
112. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003-361: 13-20.
113. Zhu MM, Feit A, Chadow H, et al. Primary stent implantation compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiol. 2001-88: 297-301.
114. Nordmann AJ, Hengstler P, Harr T, et al. Clinical outcomes of primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with myocardial infarction: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004-116: 253-62.
115. Mauri L, Silbaugh TS, Garg P, et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008-359: 1330-42.
116. Hannan EL, Racz M, Walford G, et al. Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008-1: 129-35.
117. Pasceri V, Patti G, Speciale G, et al. Meta-analysis of clinical trials on use of drug-eluting stents for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2007-153: 749-54.
118. Kastrati A, Dibra A, Spaulding C, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007-28: 2706-13.
119. De Luca G, Stone GW, Suryapranata H, et al. Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2009-133: 213-22.
120. Van de Werf F. Drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006-355: 1169-70.
121. Jo SH, Youn TJ, Koo BK, et al. Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006-48: 924-30.
122. McCullough PA, Bertrand ME, Brinker JA, et al. A meta-analysis of the renal safety of isosmolar iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006-48: 692-9.
123. Kuhn MJ, Chen N, Sahani DV, et al. The PREDICT study: a randomized double-blind comparison of contrast-induced nephropathy after low- or isoosmolar contrast agent exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008-191: 151-7.
124. Rudnick MR, Davidson C, Laskey W, et al. Nephrotoxicity of iodixanol versus ioversol in patients with chronic kidney disease: the Visipaque Angiography / Interventions with Laboratory Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency (VALOR) Trial. Am Heart J. 2008-156: 776-82.
125. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Erley CM, et al. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2008-43: 170-8.
126. Reed M, Meier P, Tamhane UU, et al. The relative renal safety of iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009-2: 645-54.
127. Heinrich MC, Haberle L, Muller V, et al. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology. 2009-250: 68-86.
128. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Bonnier HJ, et al. Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998-31: 841-7.
129. Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005-46: 438-42.
130. Botman KJ, Pijls NH, Bech JW, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease7 A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004-63: 184 -91.
131. Caymaz O, Fak AS, Tezcan H, et al. Correlation of myocardial fractional flow reserve with thallium-201 SPECT imaging in intermediateseverity coronary artery lesions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000-12: 345-50.
132. Chamuleau SA, Meuwissen M, Koch KT, et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2002-89: 377-80.
133. Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, et al. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 2007-99: 450-6.
134. Costa MA, Sabate M, Staico R, et al. Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial. Am Heart J. 2007-153: 296-7.
135. Courtis J, Rodes-Cabau J, Larose E, et al. Comparison of medical treatment and coronary revascularization in patients with moderate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008-71: 541-8.
136. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996-334: 1703-8.
137. Verna E, Lattanzio M, Ghiringhelli S, et al. Performing versus deferring coronary angioplasty based on functional evaluation of vessel stenosis by pressure measurements: a clinical outcome study. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006-7: 169-75.
138. Yanagisawa H, Chikamori T, Tanaka N, et al. Correlation between thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects and the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis as assessed by pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve. Circ J. 2002-66: 1105-9.
139. Yanagisawa H, Chikamori T, Tanaka N, et al. Application of ressurederived myocardial fractional flow reserve in assessing the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circ J. 2004-68: 993-8.
140. Park SJ, Hong MK, Lee CW, et al. Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001-38: 1054-60.
141. Seung KB, Park DW, Kim YH, et al. Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2008-358: 1781-92.
142. Chieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E, et al. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation. 2005-111: 791-5.
143. Chieffo A, Morici N, Maisano F, et al. Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation. 2006-113: 2542-7.
144. Chieffo A, Park SJ, Valgimigli M, et al. Favorable long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation in nonbifurcation lesions that involve unprotected left main coronary artery: a multicenter registry. Circulation. 2007-116: 158-62.
145. Kim YH, Dangas GD, Solinas E, et al. Effectiveness of drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2008-101: 801-6.
146. Takagi T, Stankovic G, Finci L, et al. Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation. 2002-106: 698-702.
147. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC / AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina - summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003-41: 159-68.
148. Huang HW, Brent BN, Shaw RE. Trends in percutaneous versus surgical revascularization of unprotected left main coronary stenosis in the drugeluting stent era: a report from the American College of Cardiology - National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006-68: 867-72.
149. Baim DS, Mauri L, Cutlip DC. Drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: are we ready to replace bypass surgery? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006-47: 878-81.
150. Brinker J. The left main facts: faced, spun, but alas too few. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 893-8.
151. Taggart DP, Kaul S, Boden WE, et al. Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 885-92.
152. Buszman PE, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A, et al. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008-51: 538-45.
153. Lee MS, Kapoor N, Jamal F, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drugeluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006-47: 864 -70.
154. Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, et al. Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2006-98: 54-9.
155. Rodes-Cabau J, Deblois J, Bertrand OF, et al. Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians. Circulation. 2008-118: 2374-81.
156. Sanmartin M, Baz JA, Claro R, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting stents versus surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007-100: 970-3.
157. White A, Kedia G, Mirocha J, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of left main coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008-1: 236-45.
158. Brener SJ, Galla JM, Bryant R III, et al. Comparison of percutaneous versus surgical revascularization of severe unprotected left main coronary stenosis in matched patients. Am J Cardiol. 2008-101: 169-72.
159. Kereiakes DJ, Faxon DP. Left main coronary revascularization at the crossroads. Circulation. 2006-113: 2480-4.
160. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001-345: 494-502.
161. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT III, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002-288: 2411-20.
162. Montalescot G. Angioplasty to Blunt the rise Of troponin in Acute coronary syndromes Randomized for an immediate or Delayed intervention. Available at: https://theheart.org/article/954535.do. Accessed August 3 2009.
163. Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW, et al. Routine upstream initiation vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Timing trial. JAMA. 2007-297: 591-602.
164. Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2002-359: 189-98.
165. Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007-28: 1598-660.